President Donald Trump, in a not-widely-covered move, ordered the quick release of the remaining JFK assassination documents late Friday. He said the only redactions he would allow to be made to these documents would be names and addresses of those who are still alive.
CNN reported Mr. Trump was angry the FBI and CIA wanted to withhold so many documents and/or make so many redactions that it violated the spirit of public disclosure.
CNN reported President Trump tweeted, “I am doing this for reasons of full disclosure, transparency and in order to put any and all conspiracy theories to rest.”
Mr. Trump is smart enough to make billions of dollars, engineer a hostile takeover of the less corrupt of the two major corrupt parties, and win the presidency despite being opposed by the Democrats and most of the top people in the Republican Party and their donors.
He knows that the remaining documents will show the involvement of government people in the murder of President Kennedy. Or they won’t, because CIA and FBI operatives and other criminals have had more than 50 years to get rid of incriminating evidence. If the former is right, people will have more proof of a government conspiracy. If the latter is right, those who believe there was a government conspiracy will blame LBJ, the FBI, the CIA, and other criminals of destroying the evidence. Like Clinton official Sandy (Brown Shorts) Berger did when he stuffed 9-11 documents in his reeking underpants to steal them and protect his master and mistress.
Two different people shot JFK, one from the front, and one from the rear. The Warren Commission said Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. That’s essentially all the evidence most thinking people need to know the investigation was more of a cover-up than a search for the truth.
I believe President Trump has two political motives for making the disclosures as complete as possible. One is to paint himself as an honorable man in contrast to the corrupt Democrats and establishment Republicans. The other, more important motive, in my opinion, is to protect himself from assassination by punishing the Deep State – and getting historical precedent to do so by reminding people the Deep State murdered JFK. The Deep State tried to murder or remove from office Ronald Reagan. But he survived in office, so that wound isn’t as deep in the national mind. Since liberals and some moderates and even some conservatives like Jack, the wound and the hurt are still there for many. Mr. Trump handled it right.
Now for another conspiracy aimed at parents and taxpayers across the country.
Friday evening I got commo from one of the Colorado Attorney General’s staffers saying her boss was going to appeal the ridiculous ruling of the federal judge who ruled the state’s sex offender data base is unconstitutional. She said the appeal is going to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which is in Denver. Formal arguments are pending.
I commented earlier on this site crackpot federal judge Richard Matsch ruled Colorado public officials had to kill the state’s sex offender registry and pay reparations to sex offenders. The lawyer for the predatory scum, errr, sex offender plaintiffs, is working at least two other similar cases, and in one of the cases, the ACLU is also involved on the side of the rapists and against the public.
This is a big deal. This is the ACLU and allied shysters’ next play for your money and your children.
The ACLU and other low-grade scum have been attacking sex offender registration laws across the nation for years.
Many such cases involve states whose officials have updated their sex offender registry laws after some sex offenders were convicted and sentenced. These earlier criminals through the ACLU and other lawyers who sue we the people argue such moves are illegal because they have already been sentenced.
Other ACLU and like groups’ sex offender advocacy have come against communities.
For example, the shakedown racket, errr, advocacy group California Reform Sex Offender Laws brag they muscled 44 communities to stop enforcing sex offender notification laws they didn’t like in 2014.
Janice Bellucci, the lawyer who runs California Reform Sex Offender Laws, which is now called Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws, has the following payoff tactic:
Janice whores for vermin who have molested children and other rapists against California cities whose leaders enact sex offender residency laws a little stiffer than what the state law is. She sues the city. The city attorney, usually a worm who couldn’t make it in private practice, comes in on his or her knees to the city council and advises settling out of court. Janice drops the lawsuit after she collects lawyer fees and “expenses.”
Janice has done this to many towns in the Granola State. Am I wrong to think some of these city attorneys may get kickbacks from Janice the Menace?
There is another problem Janice and/or other perv protection prostitutes may have a problem with … reporting their nonprofit groups’ incomes.
Guidestar is a website that has info on nonprofit organizations. They make public the IRS Form 990s (the tax returns) that nonprofits have to file.
California Reform Sex Offender Laws has two Form 990s on the Guidestar website. One is for tax year 2011; the other is for tax year 2015. They claimed a net of $1303 for 2011 and a net of $8491 for 2015. Convicted perv and pedophile Paul Reubens aka Pee Wee Herman, if informed of these very low figures and absent returns, might well say, “Ha-ha. Ha-HAAAAH!”
Hey Janice – is Pee Wee one of your donors?
The group changed names to Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws. That outfit, also known as ACSOL, did not have any tax returns shown on the Guidestar website.
Nor did similar groups in Arizona, Oklahoma, or New Jersey. The National Association for Rational Sex Offense Laws was also absent from the Guidestar website.
Is Guidestar incomplete? Or are the rapist lobby groups in the wrong over the missing info from the Guidestar site?
Al Capone ordered murders, extortion rackets, and compulsory prostitution. But none of that stuck to him. The Feds busted Al Capone for failure to file taxes. A low-grade offense, except for government. You can bond out on murder or other organized crimes if you have the money. But not paying your taxes? Then the government wants a piece of you.
In Capone’s case, a tax case was the only prosecution that would work. Illinois state and local officials were crooked. Jurors could be bribed or threatened, The FBI, like today, was political and ineffective against many real criminals with juice. It took the Treasury Department and a federal judge who switched juries on Scarface to put him in prison.
Now to address the concerns of these civil liberties con artists.
There are sure ways to avoid winding up on a state’s sexual predator registry. DON’T RAPE. DON’T MOLEST. DON’T ABUSE. DON’T EXPLOIT. DON’T TRAFFIC IN GIRLS.
Some in the rapist lobby claim the sex offender registries lead to more sex offenses. Others claim sex offenders have lower recidivism rates than other offenders. These sex offender suck-ups need to co-ordinate their lying a little better.
Murderers do have lower recidivism rates than thieves. Why? Because most of them stay in prison a long long time. Some, after all their appeals run out, even meet Mr. Sparky or The Needle.
This is what should happen to rapists, especially those who rape children.
Kentucky sheriffs used to hang convicted rapists on the lawns of their county courthouses. By state law. What parent wouldn’t want that level of justice for child rapists?
Sex offenders have higher recidivism rates than what is reported because victims, especially children, in most cases are too scared and/or humiliated to report. Some sex offenders, when released to prey upon the public again, are smarter about who they target and how they commit more sex crimes to stay out of trouble. But it doesn’t mean they aren’t a threat to children or that they are raping less.
If the low-grade scum who support sex offenders are right about sex offenders committing fewer sex crimes when released, they are proving the sex offender registries are a great idea. Why? Marking sexual predators as criminal scum publicly keeps out of their paths many potential victims who otherwise might stray there. To help people too poor to have Internet access to sex offender criminal registries, I wouldn’t oppose face-branding convicted rapists and those who commit other sex offenses against children.
Some of these rapist reps argue it is a violation of a rapist’s civil liberties to be put on a sex offender registry with sterner requirements than there were when he was convicted and sentenced. All the feds and any state’s leaders need to do, if anything, in running a sex offender registry is call it a public repository of information to warn the public. The fact a rapist has a rape conviction is a public record unless he got a soft plea bargain deal or was a juvenile when he raped a victim. The earlier sex offenders are no better than those convicted after the sex offender registry laws came onto the books. Under the spirit of freedom of information laws, there is no reason not to put the earlier offenders’ predator histories on the record before the law got tougher. Instead of calling it punishment, call it informational.
If the Supreme Court in some future fit of depravity or senility or blackmail victimhood rules sex offender registries are cruel and unusual, they are still factual, unless state people who put them together negligently took the sex offenders at their words when they interviewed them for info. (This happened in Ohio under the regimes of incompetent former attorney general Richard Cordray, and his mildly more competent successor Mike DeWine. They admit their website has errors because they rely on sexual predators to tell the truth. They have admitted their failings on the state ESORN page for years.) This means there is nothing to stop private nonprofits who are on the side of law enforcement from making them available to the public. (We provide a path to the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public website on this website.)
Another reason for saving sex offender records and making them public is that too many public officials and their lawyers destroy a lot of records to let sex offenders with government jobs off the hook.
California children, in the state where predator prostie Janice Bellucci lives and practices lawfare, are especially vulnerable due to the public officials and government employees who pull paychecks in the Granola State.
Los Angeles Unified School District officials let grade school teacher Mark Berndt resign in 2011. Sheriff’s deputies showed school district officials photos of boys and girls being gagged with tape and blindfolded, and some being fed spoonfuls of a substance alleged to be semen. Lawmen arrested Berndt for a number of lewd conduct offenses.
School district officials suspended Berndt. Berndt lawyered up with lawyers who teachers’ union officials use to defend their dirtbags, so school officials allowed him to resign (instead of firing him) and keep his $4000 a month pension. They also paid him his full salary and paid his legal expenses. Since then, roughly 200 pupils’ parents have sued the school district because Berndt apparently fed kids his sperm for decades. School officials wound up reassigning every staffer at the school where Berndt taught and abused kids, because not a one of them ever came forward to report Berndt for his crimes. Some parents refused to settle lawsuits with the L.A. Unified School District, because they accused them of withholding information.
Sadly, the parents were proven right. L.A. Unified School District officials had records dating back to 1983 in which pupils or parents complained Berndt committed sexual acts, from dropping his pants before startled children during a field trip, to masturbating in class, to molesting children. MEANWHILE, L.A. UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIALS DID NOTHING.
So who exposed Berndt? A drugstore employee who developed film Berndt dropped off saw 40 photos of children with their eyes and mouths taped shut and roaches on their faces, or children being fed what looked like semen. Unlike the scumbag public school officials, the hourly employee had the integrity to call police. Berndt in 2013 drew a 25-year-sentence for molesting children. Among his other crimes, said a judge who ruled to make public a lot of info in the case, were forcing children to touch his genitals, exposing himself to children, and groping girls’ vaginas and breasts … on those girls barely old enough to have small breasts.
In the wake of the Berndt case came the revelation L.A. Unified School District lawyers destroyed 20 years of sex offense records against teachers and other employees of the district – from 1988 to 2008 – in 2008. A spokesperson for lawyers representing LAUSD against the parents of children Berndt molested admitted to the records destroying – after the records went to the general counsel of the school district – during an interview in 2014.
You read that right. SCHOOL DISTRICT SCUMBAG LAWYERS DECIDED TO DESTROY THE RECORDS OF TWO DECADES OF SEX ABUSE INFO ON TEACHERS AND OTHER PAYROLLERS IN THE NATION’S SECOND LARGEST SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHY AREN’T THEY IN PRISON??
A L.A. Unified School District lawyer tried to prevent Los Angeles County Superior Court officials from making the info on Berndt public. Since most of it was info L.A. County Sheriff’s Department deputies gathered, LAUSD lawyers didn’t get a chance to destroy it, and lie about it for their LAUSD masters.
Back east, 11 words. Penn State. Jerry Sandusky. State officials and employees. Offenders and enablers.
Then there is garden variety negligence. Even leftist publications like the Huffington Post and the Los Angeles Times have reported California officials and/or their contractors have put hundreds of children (600 to 1000) in residences and facilities whose addresses show up in the state sex offender registry in recent years. Kentucky officials, by comparison, put 12 foster children into such places in the same general time period. If they had California’s population, they would have harmed 120 children this way. This is by no means acceptable, but California is way out of control any way you measure the state.
An Illinois government payroller who over the phone identified himself as Jim Crowley admitted to me in 2016 that Illinois imbeciles, errr, pimps, errr, government employees placed foster children in homes with sex offenders routinely. I was working to get a child out of such a reported hellhole.
Parole officers underachieve routinely. Barneys in the California parole system do not check on many of the sex offenders they are supposed to check. Nor do all too many in other states. Convicted rapist John Gardner lived near a school and got onto the grounds of a prison after his parole, state parole officials admitted. His parole officers overlooked these items. Gardner raped and beheaded Amber DuBois in early 2009, and then raped and strangled Chelsea King in early 2010, no thanks to his parole nonsupervision.
California Inspector General David Shaw in 2010 detailed the parole officers’ failings in a report ironically titled “The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s Supervision of John Gardner.”
Then there is the VD and zoo filth-filled jacuzzi called Hollywood. The most recently outed perv is actor Kevin Spacey. He tried to pass off his attempt to impose himself on a 14-year-old boy to being drunk and homosexual. The “gay” excuse may work in Harveywood, but not in real life. If what is being alleged about Spacey is true, he’s not only a deviate, but also a sexual predator – which in too many places is still a protected class.
Some of this is going on in the political class too. Women in politics are recounting unwelcome advances and worse as we speak. Sadly, they by and large didn’t expose the alleged government official pervs when it happened years earlier. Except for Paula Jones.
Many of them may be telling the truth. Except for Elizabeth Warren, who claims she was sexually victimized. Besides lying about having American Indian blood so she could possibly get teaching gigs where applicants got extra points for minority heritage, the forensic evidence appears to be against Lieawatha Warren. She not only speaks with forked tongue, but photographic evidence shows her puss is so emetic only someone certifiably repugnant like Janet Reno would kiss it.
Let’s understand something about sex offenses. At least half of all sexual offense victims are girls – females 17 or younger. Half of girl victims are 12 to 15. Another 10 to 15 percent of all sexual offense victims are boys – males 17 or younger. Most boy victims are 10 or younger. Of the remaining 35 or so percent, most are young women 18 to 30. (This does not count prisons, government-run institutions where same-sex assaults are almost all of the sexual offense crimes.) These stats come from the U.S. Justice Department and my math on their figures.
In other words, most victims are children, and the average child victim is a victim many times. The average young woman victim is a victim once. Sexual predators ruin children by raping them repeatedly. This is why the public is rightly concerned.
Let’s understand something else. The ACLU and like minded people are parasitical cancer. The ACLU and others like them have apparently become an extortion racket. In my opinion, what nuisance lawsuit groups do in suing towns with Nativity Scenes or school districts without bathrooms for self-identifying freaks into doing their bidding against the will of the vast majority of the public is akin to running a shakedown, a protection racket, or some other form of extortion. In my opinion, they commit abuse of process. They plot to sue small government entities in federal court in areas where they figure the cases will go to sympathetic judges, or the appeals will go to sympathetic judges. They find some dorks to be “local aggrieved citizens,” and then they file suit.
In many cases, the ACLU or a similar nuisance litigation group doesn’t have to pay legal fees if a judge throws out their case against a local government. So there is very little risk to the nuisances.
Even if the ACLU or a similar nuisance litigation group wins nominal damages, they often win full legal fees, which they jack up through the stratosphere. Judges – who are also lawyers – allow it. This is how such groups parasite off of the public.
Many millions of dollars of the ACLU’s budget come from lawsuit wins or settlements against small government entities. You can see the ACLU’s IRS returns (Form 990s, for nonprofit groups, which are public records obtainable thru the IRS, thru some on-line charity monitoring companies like Guidestar, and randomly on the Internet), and in some cases their audited financial statements which they make public.
The ACLU’s Form 990s (nonprofit group tax returns) also indicate quite a few ACLU employees get more than $200,000 a year. This doesn’t count the lawyers they retain who are not employees.
Sex offender reparations are the next gold rush for these vermin.
There are hundreds of thousands of registered sex offenders across the nation. Sex offender advocacy lawyers may well make into the billions of dollars in legal fees at the expense of the taxpayers if the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court let Madman Matsch’s freaky federal court ruling stand.
Rapists will get cover. And rapists will get your money. They will be paid “reparations” for being labeled as sexual offenders. That’s right. These felons and their light-fingered lawyers will rob you, with government help, and your children will be more at risk.
This must change.
I am going to ask you, my readers, to look up your state attorney general’s website and send him or her a letter, either directly, or thru his or her media people (who always list their e-mails because they need to have contact with the media) telling him or her to file an amicus curiae brief in support of the citizens of Colorado, and especially their children, on this matter.
Or if you have an in with your local prosecutor, ask him or her to do likewise.
If any of you readers is an attorney, perhaps you could send in such a brief if you have experience germane to the issues at hand.
An amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief allows outside parties to give their side of the story to a court. This is helpful to a litigant who has justice on his or her side but not money. It also helps government agencies with limited resources going against a nationwide special interest group that is well funded and has plenty of unethical attorneys at their beck and call. I have done research for such cases and have provided many examples of wrongdoing by the people I investigated for the attorneys filing amicus curiae briefs.
The appellant(s) in this case are the Colorado Bureau of Investigation and its director Michael Rankin. Their attorney(s) will be from the office of Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman. The plaintiffs (rapists) are David Millard, Eugene Knight, and Arturo Vega. Millard pled guilty to sexual assault on a minor and got a soft 90-day work release sentence. Knight pled guilty to attempted sexual assault on a child, a crime he committed when he was 18. He also drew a 90-day work release sentence. Vega was a teenager when he pleaded guilty to an unspecified sexual assault charge. He also failed to register as a sex offender when he was supposed to do so.
A defense lawyer website provided the above info about the scumbags. It was kinder and gentler than what the state sex offender data base noted. According to the Colorado state sex offender website, one scumbag committed felony sexual penetration (rape), and another of the scumbags raped a child. The third scumbag’s offense wasn’t on the website. Maybe this was due to his age at the time.
I’ll bet the child victims called it beyond horrible.
The child molesters’ chippie is Alison Ruttenberg. She is called a civil rights attorney. More than 20 years ago, she was called a sexual harassment lawyer by a Newsweek reporter in a 11/24/1996 article about the rapes of female soldiers. (The Colorado Supreme Court Attorney Discipline website says she’s been a lawyer in the state since 1988.) Maybe whoring for sex offenders is more lucrative than protecting rape victims.
The appeals case, at this writing, is slated to take place at the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver. The address of this court of appeals is:
Byron White U.S. Courthouse
1823 Stout Street
Denver, CO 80257-1823
The Clerk’s Office main phone number is 303-844-3157.
Interested individuals and media representatives can register to receive notices in cases of interest in the Tenth Circuit. Registering permits the user to receive public notices of docket activity issued in particular proceedings. You do not need to be an attorney to register for a “public interested person” account.
The Clerk of Courts says you may register for an account at: http://www.pacer.gov/reg_ap.html
You will receive an email regarding your request as soon as they are able to process it. After your registration has been accepted, follow the steps below to set up notifications. (For help with registration, you can contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6856 or pacer@psc.uscourts.gov.)
In the long run, if you can, please take a look at doing one or more of these:
Push your state representatives and members of Congress to make groups like the ACLU liable for expenses when they lose. Also have them enact laws limiting amounts plaintiffs can collect for certain civil rights cases and urge them to enact laws setting a low maximum on what cause groups like the ACLU can bill for legal fees – a limit low like a public defender hourly rate. This would cut the average legal bill from such groups by 80 to 90 percent.
Press your state attorney general and your state’s governor to oppose this ruling when Colorado state attorneys appeal it. Likewise, contact your state representatives and your local police chief or sheriff to fight it. This is a nationwide case that could end your state’s sex offender register and make you pay rapists “reparations.”
Press Attorney General Sessions and your representatives to defend the Adam Walsh Child Protection And Safety Act of 2006. This helped make sex offender registries easier to access. John Walsh is reachable at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and at the Justice Network.
Teach your children to avoid trouble and to level with you if someone is treating her or him in a sexually wrong way. Work with them to improve their assertiveness and fighting skills. The good people of Carlie’s Crusade can give you in-depth advice; they are on the Internet.
Check the background of your children’s teachers and other adults in their lives. Be alert to people in the neighborhood. As long as you have access to sexual offender registries, use them.
Homeland security begins when women and children are safe. You are your children’s first responder.
SHERLOCK JUSTICE
WE CAN SHOW YOU HOW TO BE YOUR OWN DETECTIVE.
END NOTES
Info on this post comes from the following sources:
On the JFK documents:
CNN, 10/28/2017
On Kevin Spacey:
CNN, 10/30/2017
On Elizabeth Warren:
New York Post, 10/22/2017
On sex offenders and the lawyers who profit from such cases:
Denver Post, 9/1/2017, 9/13/2017
San Diego Union Tribune, 8/7/2017
South Bay (Los Angeles County) Daily Breeze, 12/2/2015
Los Angeles Times, 7/3/2015
Huffington Post, 10/27/2011
NARSOL website
ACSOL website
Iyer Law Office (criminal defense lawyers) blog on the Colorado sex offender registry case
J.J. Prescott, “Do Sex Offender Registries Make Us Less Safe?” Regulation magazine, Summer 2012
Paul Heroux, “The Disappearing Sex Offender,” Huffington Post, 5/21/2016. This clown (D) is a state representative in Massachusetts. When people elect this sort of representative, it implies Massachusetts is less a state than a condition.
Info on the Los Angeles Unified School district and teachers Mark Berndt and the lawyers of the school district who destroyed the sex abuse records of the district comes from a 12/6/2012 article by Christina Hoag of Associated Press, a 2/1/2012 Los Angeles Times article, a 2/29/2012 article by Tami Abdollah and Shirley Jahad for radio station KPCC, a 5/1/2014 NBC-TV (Los Angeles) article, and Juliet Rylah’s 5/1/2014, 9/26/2014, and 11/13/2014 articles for the website LAIST.
