• Today is: Monday, April 29, 2024

Judges, Not anti-Trump Feds, Upheld the Law this Week

Sherlock
May06/ 2018

President Trump’s term of office has been an ongoing civics lesson.

Mr. Trump’s foes in the Democrat and Republican parties and in the federal government and in state governments and in academia and the entertainment businesses, and in corporate America have attacked him without letup since the day he declared he was running for president in 2015.

Mr. Trump has gotten big business people like the Koch Brothers and the Chamber of Commerce to admit they want to break the wage scale by flooding the country with lesser foreigners. This includes those in the tech fields.

Mr. Trump has gotten the entire Democrat Party to admit they prefer illegal aliens to Americans in jobs and in civil liberties. The Dems don’t care many of the illegals are also robbers, rapists, and murderers. As long as they take welfare and vote Democrat, the Dems are on their side.

Mr. Trump has gotten the entire Democrat Party and many Republicans to admit they consider his sexual playboy past far worse than selling one-fifth of our uranium reserves to the Russians.

Hillary bagged about $150 million for this act of treason, which FBI chiefs Robert Mueller and James Comey and Justice Department honchos Andrew McCabe and Rod Rosenstein let her get away with. If any one of them had blown the whistle, she would have been in hot water. Instead, by being bribed with money or tenure, or by being blackmailed, these four men were complicit in the coverup.

 

PROSECUTORS HAVE TO NOTIFY DEFENDANTS OF CHARGES

Russian operatives, or more properly, American lawyers they hired, understand except in very unusual circumstances, a defendant in a civil or a criminal case has to be served (notified of charges) before a case can proceed.

The Dem logo is false. Instead of a cracked bell, it needs to show a cracked pot.

Politico, a left of center publication, had this to say 5/5/2018 about the Mueller team’s case against Russians accused of political meddling:

“A federal judge has rejected special counsel Robert Mueller’s request to delay the first court hearing in a criminal case charging three Russian companies and 13 Russian citizens with using social media and other means to foment strife among Americans in advance of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

In a brief order Saturday evening, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich (DC Circuit) offered no explanation for her decision to deny a request prosecutors made Friday to put off the scheduled Wednesday arraignment for Concord Management and Consulting, one of the three firms charged in the case.

The 13 people charged in the high-profile indictment in February are considered unlikely to ever appear in a U.S. court. The three businesses accused of facilitating the alleged Russian troll farm operation — the Internet Research Agency, Concord Management, and Concord Catering — were also expected to simply ignore the American criminal proceedings.

Last month, however, a pair of Washington-area lawyers suddenly surfaced in the case, notifying the court that they represent Concord Management. POLITICO reported at the time that the move appeared to be a bid to force Mueller’s team to turn over relevant evidence to the Russian firm and perhaps even to bait prosecutors into an embarrassing dismissal in order to avoid disclosing sensitive information.

On Friday, Mueller’s prosecutors disclosed that Concord’s attorneys, Eric Dubelier and Kate Seikaly, had made a slew of discovery requests demanding nonpublic details about the case and the investigation. Prosecutors also asked a judge to postpone the formal arraignment of Concord Management set for next week.

The prosecution team sought the delay on the grounds that it’s unclear whether Concord Management formally accepted the court summons related to the case. Mueller’s prosecutors also revealed that they tried to deliver the summonses for Concord and IRA through the Russian government, without success.

Mueller’s team sent a copy of the formal summons to Dubelier and Seikaly and asked them to accept it on behalf of Concord Management, but Dubelier wrote back on Monday saying that the government’s attempt to serve the summons was defective under court rules. He did not elaborate.

The three companies named in the indictment are all reported to be controlled by a Russian businessman known as Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “chef,” Yevgeny Prigozhin. He’s also one of the 13 individuals criminally charged in the case.

In their request on Friday to put off the arraignment, prosecutors included the extensive demands for information that the lawyers for Concord Management have set forth since they stepped forward last month.

In a blunt response Saturday morning, Concord’s attorneys accused Mueller’s team of ignoring the court’s rules and suggesting a special procedure for the Russian firm without any supporting legal authority.

The Concord lawyers said Mueller’s attorneys were seeking “to usurp the scheduling authority of the Court” by waiting until Friday afternoon to try to delay a proceeding scheduled for next Wednesday. Dubelier and Seikaly complained that the special counsel’s office has not replied at all to Concord’s discovery requests. The lawyers, who work for Pittsburgh-based law firm Reed Smith, also signaled Concord intends to assert its speedy trial rights, putting more pressure on the special counsel’s office to turn over records related to the case.

Friedrich, a Trump appointee based in Washington, sided with Concord and said the arraignment will proceed as scheduled Wednesday afternoon.

Government lawyers in Mueller’s Gestapo have to play by the rules too. They have to serve defendants properly and they have to answer legitimate questions posed by the defense in discovery. I believe they sought a delay because they don’t want to disclose the details of their criminal scam to defense lawyers or a judge.

 

PROSECUTOR AGENT PULLED UNETHICAL STUNT IN HER DIVORCE CASE

Here’s a case from my files showing plaintiffs have to have defendants served properly or lose out.

The woman in question came on to my radar by shacking up with a serial child rapist and moving to our area with Chester the Molester as her housemate. The woman was free to rut with a serial child rapist because she sued her husband for divorce almost a decade and many many pounds earlier. She alleged she needed much more money from her estranged husband to complete college so she could earn a living. She also claimed she was afraid of him and sought a restraining order against him.

In June 2001, a judge granted the woman a divorce on grounds of “gross neglect of duty” and “extreme cruelty.” He granted the woman a generous alimony and child support agreement. He also ordered her now ex-husband to vacate the property and take his clothes and tools with him. Since the husband didn’t appear in court, this was essentially a default judgment against him.

Hubby fired back in October 2001, after he got a lawyer, who is female. He claimed his woman essentially got a stealth divorce from him, because while he thought they were reconciling, she moved ahead with the divorce case in court. One day, he said, while he took the boys to Chuck E. Cheese with her approval, she went to court and obtained the divorce. He said he thought she was going to court to dismiss the divorce case.

He then told the judge his wife had misled him (the judge) about their real estate and her finances. He said the property they owned had a house and a separate workshop on it. He said he ran his small heating and cooling business from the workshop. The judge had ordered him off the property, away from where he did much of his work.

Hubby said his ex-wife needed to complete her education, but only a few weeks worth instead of years, as she or her lawyer implied. Hubby noted she was a few weeks away from getting her degree in social work.

Why was this guy dumb enough to assume this gal was withdrawing her divorce case instead of going for the victory in court? He didn’t retain a lawyer to fight her, he said, because she told him she wanted to reconcile.

Hubby admitted he moved out of the house for a separation when she sought a divorce, but noted she and he “continued to date” and “we continued to have an intimate relationship” at the family home and at his place during their separation. He continued to work at his workshop to pay the family’s bills. He said he ate dinner with his woman and their three sons as many as four nights a week even though they were separated. He said even after she obtained the divorce in June 2001, they “continued to talk and date.” He said after the divorce, “on more than one occasion my wife came to me while I was working in my shop and initiated intimate contact.” He also said, “We were intimate as recently as August (2001),” two months after the divorce.

In so many words he said his estranged woman was either getting close and personal (or maybe was even having sex with him repeatedly) during the separation and after the divorce. This was an awfully odd way for her to show fear!

Summit County Ohio child support enforcement agent Jean Workman and serial child molester Scott Dietz at a kiddle park. I took this photo off her Facebook page. We contacted her boss County Prosecutor Sherri Bevan Walsh (a vengeful leftist hack) about her employee and her child molestin’ sugar bear. She kept her job, but we supplied info on how much money Dietz owed to the state as welfare reimbursement for raping his very little girls to attorneys who opposed Ms. Workman in court. She was laid off, but got a job with another county agency. Jean serviced this guy after he made his little girls fellate him, and after he admitted to molesting his own kid sister and two young cousins. Many prosecutor types and others in law enforcement are corrupt as hell. Avoid Akron and the rest of Summit County if you don’t have to be there.

 

Maybe in her social worker schooling, someone showed her how to construct an untruthful and/or misleading restraining order request. However, she apparently didn’t get enough training in rebuttal. She apparently did not try to contest her ex’s statements, even though the ones implying sexual activity were only his word against hers. Her college schooling issue was easy to verify in his favor. The Chuck E. Cheese incident would have been easy enough to check out. The case file of the divorce had no record showing she or her lawyer tried to refute the husband’s statements.

The divorce court judge changed the terms of the divorce. He didn’t go after the woman for perjury, but he cut her alimony and child support by several hundred dollars a month. He also gave the husband the right to keep working at his workshop on the property and the opportunity to buy her out of the house. Hubby took it.

Soon after she got her college degree, this woman got a job as a child support enforcement agent with the county prosecutor’s office in Summit County, Ohio. A few years later, this woman, Jean Powell aka Jean Workman, shacked up with and years later married serial child molester Scott Dietz. She kept her prosecutor job a while, even after I had hard leftist Democrat Summit County Prosecutor Sherri Bevan Walsh served with info on the mating habits and the veracity of this agent of hers.

(Jean Workman’s divorce case is 2000DR01754 in Stark County Common Pleas Court in Canton, Ohio.)

 

COMEY LEAKER, SANDY BERGER, PAULA BROADWELL

There are three branches of America’s federal government – executive, legislative, and judicial. The concept is not to let any one branch get too powerful. But when people like the Clintons and Barack Obama and the Bushes fill the intelligence and law enforcement communities’ leadership ranks with their own corrupt henchmen, they can attack the independence of the other two branches of government.

Or when these corrupt presidents put corrupt judges in place, and use the intelligence community to blackmail members of Congress and others (like, in my opinion, Chief Justices Roberts and Associate Justice Kennedy), they compromise the independence of the other branches.

President Trump inherits an executive branch filled with 30 years of mostly corrupt and/or incompetent hires, protected by civil service rules and beholden to the Democrats, the establishment Republicans, and the moneyed people behind the scenes in whose interests the Democrats and the establishment Republicans govern.

The Justice Department is attacking him because he can’t replace the incompetent and the treacherous fast enough. Again, civil service rules protect criminals in government.

Mr. Trump’s opponents are encouraging Democrat state attorneys-general and lawfare extortionist groups like the ACLU to sue his administration before judges hostile to Mr. Trump to negate or postpone enforcement of his lawful policies.

In the Senate, Mitch McConnell, the GOP majority leader, works with Democrat senate boss Charles Schumer to delay confirmation of President Trump’s appointees. All Democrats usually vote like organized Communists against his appointees. Some Republicans who oppose President Trump vote against his appointees and legislation due to “concerns of conscience” – something they never showed in confirming the white-collar scumbags and failing to oppose the measures the Bushes and Clintons and Barry have put before them.

The media have refused to cover the criminal acts of President Trump’s opponents. Or, like in the case of defending women (or leftist media figures) who molest girls, they make excuses for the criminals.

Many opponents of President Trump have been breaking the law without consequences for so long that they are sloppy in covering their tracks.

Recently, it became known to the public that fired and disgraced former FBI chief James Comey made one of his buddies a “agent” so the buddy could look at FBI intelligence and other documents and then leak to the media. This is totally wrong on many levels. Per Fox News 5/3/2018:

“The Columbia law professor James Comey used as an intermediary to help leak details of sensitive memos worked as an FBI “special government employee” for at least 19 months – during which time he repeatedly defended the FBI director in media interviews amid the Hillary Clinton email probe.

Fox News first reported last week that Daniel Richman was hired as a “special government employee,” or SGE. Records reviewed by Fox News now show he signed the agreement as early as June 30, 2015. The former director previously told Fox News that Richman left the FBI in February 2017, meaning he served there for well over a year.

Sources familiar with Richman’s FBI status said he was assigned to “special projects” by Comey, and had a security clearance as well as badge access to the building. Richman told Fox News in an email last week that he was working as an SGE on an unpaid basis.

FBI records show that as a special government employee, Richman would “serve at the pleasure of the Director [Comey],” with an initial term of one year. Richman’s stated responsibilities included the use of encryption by terror suspects — known as “Going Dark.” In August 2015, his projects were expanded to include “an examination of the implications of federal investigations being brought to state and local prosecutors.”

During this time, a review of media reports between July 2015 and February 2017 shows Richman gave multiple interviews defending Comey’s handling of the Clinton email case, including the controversial decision to reopen the probe shortly before the presidential election. He was typically identified as a law professor, and sometimes as a policy adviser to Comey.

Government transcripts indicate Richman was sent talking points about the FBI’s handling of the Clinton investigation. Those talking points attempted to compare and contrast Clinton’s use of an unsecured personal server exclusively for government business with the case of retired Gen. David Petraeus, who shared classified information with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell, as well as the case brought against the late Sandy Berger. The former national security adviser under President Clinton pleaded guilty to the unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives.”

BTW, Sandy “Brown Shorts” Berger stuffed documents incriminating to the Clinton administration concerning their incompetent or criminally negligent efforts against terrorists into his soiled underpants to steal them so they could be destroyed as evidence.

Paula Broadwell. Her can-opener nose was the most lethal weapon Petraeus faced.

 

BTW, four-star general David Petraeus later became Obama’s CIA head, and helped the Magic Kenyan and Hillary lie about the Benghazi fiasco because he was compromised. Paula, a married Army officer herself, got the intel, and very intimate knowledge of Petraeus from her time, errr, under him. Paula was stupid enough to threaten Arab socialite Gilberte Khawan (aka Jill Kelley), who was linked with four-star Marine general John Allen, because she thought Jill was seeking to service HER four-star. Paula’s threats became known to the FBI, and Obama’s people put the screws to Petraeus to betray his country to secure Obama’s re-election.

Unlike Petraeus, Benedict Arnold was seriously wounded multiple times leading Americans in combat against the British before an expensive woman helped him turn traitor. Paula Broadwell, on the other hand, was just cheap, the lower-price spread.

Comey followed Robert Mueller as head of the FBI. Mueller, now the Special Counsel in the snipe hunt that is the Trump and Russia investigation, is also openly breaking the law and is encouraging his underlings to do likewise, in my opinion. At least one federal judge agrees with me.

Gestapo leader Mueller and Special Counsel Mueller

 

This federal judge accused Mueller prosecutors of breaking the law Friday. He noted Mueller’s monkeys, errr, Justice Department prosecutors working with the Special Counsel, went after short-time Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort illegally in an attempt to get him to say things against President Trump.

The judge also demanded to see an unredacted copy of the document outlining the scope of the Special Counsel’s authority.

Fox News reported the following 5/3/2018:

“A federal judge on Friday harshly rebuked Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team during a hearing for ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort – suggesting they lied about the scope of the investigation, are seeking “unfettered power” and are more interested in bringing down the president.

“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort,” U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III told Mueller’s team. “You really care about what information Mr. Manafort can give you to lead you to Mr. Trump and an impeachment, or whatever.”

Further, Ellis demanded to see the unredacted “scope memo,” a document outlining the scope of the special counsel’s Russia probe that congressional Republicans have also sought.

Manafort’s attorneys argue the special counsel does not have the power to indict him on the charges they have brought – and seemed to find a sympathetic ear with Ellis.

The Reagan-appointed judge asked Mueller’s team where they got the authority to indict Manafort on alleged crimes dating as far back as 2005.

The special counsel argues that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein granted them broad authority in his May 2, 2017 letter appointing Mueller to this investigation. But after the revelation that the team is using information from the earlier DOJ probe, Ellis said that information did not “arise” out of the special counsel probe – and therefore may not be within the scope of that investigation.

“We don’t want anyone with unfettered power,” he said.

Mueller’s team says its authorities are laid out in documents including the August 2017 scope memo – and that some powers are actually secret because they involve ongoing investigations and national security matters that cannot be publicly disclosed.

(Comment: Ooooooooh – secret powers. Spooooooky!)

Ellis seemed amused and not persuaded.

He summed up the argument of the Special Counsel’s Office as, “We said this was what [the] investigation was about, but we are not bound by it and we were lying.”

The judge also gave the government two weeks to hand over the unredacted “scope memo” or provide an explanation why not — after prosecutors were reluctant to do so, claiming it has material that doesn’t pertain to Manafort.

“I’ll be the judge of that,” Ellis said.”

 

CORRUPT FEDS ON COHEN RAID, HILLARY CASE

Rod Rosenstein, the No. 2 in the Justice Department, appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller in 2017. Mueller was supposed to check if the Trump campaign illegally worked with Russian nationals to influence the 2016 election. Instead Mueller’s monkeys had Manafort’s home raided in the wee hours of the morning like a Gestapo operation. Manafort, who has openly had dealings in Russia and Ukraine, is being charged with things he supposedly did many years earlier, but is not being charged with anything he may have done to help the Russians fix an election. Mueller’s and the FBI’s lawbreaking is self-evident.

NBC and ABC reported Thursday the FBI has been wiretapping President Trump’s personal attorney Michael Cohen, implying the FBI had to raid Cohen’s office, house, and hotel room because he was allegedly destroying evidence. Maybe. Possibly. In our dreams. So let’s raid him.

The raid itself, okayed by Rosenstein and executed by FBI agents and prosecutors in the outlaw Southern District of New York, was illegal as it violated client-attorney privilege under the Sixth Amendment.

Then NBC dialed it back a little, saying the feds only checked to see what phone numbers Cohen was calling or receiving calls from. Did the FBI spy on Cohen illegally, or did they lie about it to tip the scales against Cohen? Either way, the FBI and the federal prosecutors in New York City appear to have broken the law if they were wiretapping without a legal warrant. Or if they lied about Cohen committing serious crimes to get a warrant, when what they wanted to do was see if Cohen made a stripper go away. And leaking about such an operation is also illegal.

My guess is the feds will claim NBC and ABC newspeople lied. Problem is they’re liars too.

President Trump noted to reporters he had a retainer agreement with Cohen for $35,000 a month for Cohen to handle issues, like many celebrities have. He said Cohen didn’t check in with him to tell him what was coming up each month, and he didn’t have to know. Shady characters try to shake down celebs all the time, so Mr. Trump’s arrangement is prudent.

Especially when the Dems, looking for women they could bribe to lie about Mr. Trump, push forward such liars routinely. Cohen evidently paid porn performer Stormy Daniels to keep the media from using her two days before an election to smear Mr. Trump some more and cost him the win. Even if she resurfaced later, the election would be in the bag.

Stormy imaginary thug police sketch and Stormy and her X-man …. courtesy of TMZ 

 

The apparently very flexible Stormy bit herself in the backside when she claimed a thug in 2011, five years after she claimed she serviced Mr. Trump and hinted at huddling with Pittsburgh Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger, threatened her and told her not to mention Mr. Trump. This was a ludicrous lie on her part. Even funnier was when she described her imaginary assailant, the police sketch of the guy looked like her ex-husband.

Trump is not Clinton. Assuming Stormy did rent herself out to The Donald, he paid her. That was the commercial agreement. He didn’t rape her or threaten her like Bill and Hillary would have done. She is still alive; she is not an Arkancide.

Stormy evidently got much more money from Dem sugar daddies and sugar mamas to come forward recently. It was a career move on Stormy’s part. Her looks are fading; 40-something women with facial wrinkles from decades of debauchery are not as marketable as younger porn stars who haven’t suffered the effects of degradation; face lifts and breast works cost money. The Dems had better be paying Stormy well; she has killed her career as a prostitute by blabbing about people who were her alleged clientele. I predict the Dems will drop her like the feminists dropped Norma McCorvey after they got abortion legalized and supported by Dems and a lot of GOPers.

Trump’s opponents in the Deep State are violating the First Amendment as it applies to their opponents. They are openly looking to repeal the Second Amendment so honest Americans won’t be able to defend themselves against Feds or other criminals. They violate the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures when rooting thru the homes and offices of friends of President Trump, because they are doing so after apparently falsifying statements to secure warrants. We’ve covered how they violated the Sixth Amendment against Mr. Trump by seizing info pertaining to Mr. Trump from his attorney. If the attorney is being investigated for illegal activities of his own, like Mueller’s monkeys claim, and is not working with a client to break the law, then his client files are off limits to the feds or anyone else.

And the top Dems and many establishment GOPers for at least two generations have been violating the Ninth and Tenth Amendments that limit the powers of the federal government with respect to the states and the people.

This doesn’t count their illegal twisting of the 14th Amendment to let in illegals when an illegal female plays baby blanket bingo and drops one on American soil. The 14th Amendment was designed by Reconstruction Era Republicans to make blacks born in America citizens and punish high ranking members of the defeated Confederacy. About 500 babies were born to alien mothers on American soil at Ellis Island; none of them got American citizenship except for a baby girl whose father was an American citizen.

A week ago, the House Intelligence Committee members released a report clearing President Trump of working with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. They noted former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper denied, then admitted, he gave info of the fake Clinton/Steele dossier on Mr. Trump to media members just before his inauguration. Clapper got a paid analyst job with CNN afterward. This jibes with Comey’s memo saying CNN needed a “hook” – new news item – to justify writing about the fake dossier so they could slime Mr. Trump. (Breitbart 4/28/2018)

Of course, this is also a violation of the law by Clapper, even assuming there was a legitimate investigation going on concerning Mr. Trump. Police forces are constrained by law in what they can release to the media or to anyone else not in the investigation, especially if they don’t make arrests. Unlawful disclosure by police and prosecutors jeopardizes witnesses, alerts suspects, and needlessly tars subjects especially if they are innocent and are never charged. A former state attorney general, Kathleen Kane (D-PA) is looking at serving time in prison for leaking grand jury info and lying about it to punish a political rival. She is still free as she has appealed her criminal conviction. (Philadelphia Inquirer, 4/4/2018)

Ex-Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane was cuffed by police after her criminal conviction. Yet more proof many prosecutors are criminals, convicted or protected.

 

Disgraced FBI official Lisa Page, who disgraced FBI official Peter Strzok was strzoking, has quit the FBI. She and he were in on the putsch against President Trump that failed. She as an FBI official would have to answer questions truthfully …. but probably would get a lighter sentence in the coming charges against the putschists in the FBI and elsewhere in the Justice Department, if she had stayed in and testified truthfully to her crimes and those of others. Risky move, girl.

Ellen De Generes, who helped the FBI and the Moslem-friendly management of the Mandalay Bay Hotel lie to the American public about the shooters who murdered several dozen country music fans in Las Vegas, may well be hoping Lisa Page and Stormy Daniels consider doing middle-age lesbian porn. She has a comfy couch ready for both soiled doves if they choose to twitter on her show.

What is driving Mueller, Rosenstein, Comey, and Andrew McCabe? Could it be to divert building pressure to prosecute them for their roles in the Uranium One treason?

In the Uranium One case, the Clinton Foundation got $145 million from the Russians in exchange for allowing one-fifth of US uranium reserves to fall into the Putin regime’s hands. There is a whistleblower/businessman operative on ice somewhere dying to tell what he knows about the case before he becomes an Arkancide.

Mueller ran the FBI then, and recently fired FBI No. 2 Andrew McCabe, a serial liar, reportedly ran the operation against the Uranium One Russians. Rosenstein was the Justice Department lawyer who ran the prosecutions. Problem is, the feds didn’t bring charges against anyone important. And the Russkies still got our uranium.

Comey inherited the case, McCabe, and Rosenstein stayed on it. But the Three Amigos didn’t do much of anything on it. Hillary’s foundation kept the $145 million.

Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein, McCabe, and other Obama-era FBI and Justice Department minions, in my opinion, may soon face investigation for their own lawbreaking on the Clinton Foundation’s crimes. Per the 5/1/2018 Washington Times, this:

“House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte Tuesday urged Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate allegations that top Obama-era Department of Justice officials tried to shut down the FBI probe into the Clinton Foundation during the 2016 presidential election.

“At a minimum the allegations deserve further scrutiny to determine whether the FBI was hampered in any way by top offcials in the Department of Justice, top officials of the FBI itself, or senior offcials of the Obama Administration,” Mr. Goodlatte wrote in a letter to the Attorney General. “Please confirm that the DOJ will take immediate steps to investigate this matter and hold any wrongdoers accountable.”

An inspector general report on former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe released last month detailed an August 2016 phone call from a high-ranking Justice Department official. Mr. McCabe thought the call was made to scuttle the FBI’s Clinton Foundation investigation while Hillary Clinton was running for president, according to the report.

(McCabe’s wife Jill took a bribe, errr, contribution from Friend of Hillary and Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe in her failed run for a state senate seat in the Old Dominion. McCabe was fired earlier this year for his crimes.)

The official was “very pissed off” at the FBI, the report said. He demanded to know why the FBI was still investigating the Clinton Foundation when the Justice Department considered it a dormant case according to the report.

The inspector general only identified by the caller by the Principal Associate Deputy General (PADAG) and not by name. Last month sources told the Washington Times that Matthew Axelrod held that position at the time of the call.

In his letter, Mr. Goodlatte said there are indications that Mr. Axelrod is the PADAG.

Mr. Axelrod directly reported to then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, raising questions about whether she was aware of the call.

Neither Mr. Axelrod nor Ms. Yates responded to multiple emails and phone calls seeking comment. An attempt to speak with them last week during a Georgetown Law School conference where they were both speaking was shut down.

“It appears that the PADAG was at the very least inquiring into why the FBI was pursuing a case against the Clinton Foundation during the election, and at worst, attempting to improperly and illegally influence the status of an ongoing investigation for purely partisan purposes,” Mr. Goodlatte wrote. “Both options are unseemly and should be investigated.”

Later, Mr. Goodlatte wrote, “it is important to determine whether the PADAG’s direction to Mr. McCabe resulted in any ‘stand down’ order being given to agents in these offices.”

Speaking of tanked FBI investigations, James Comey in 2016 declared Hillary innocent of the e-mail scandal before having her interviewed, with no oath and no taping of her remarks. And he said he had to clear her again before the election so her presidency wouldn’t be untainted.

The fix was in to put Hillary in the White House, but we the people foiled it.

In other words, Comey expected Hillary to win so he had to get rid of an investigation of her criminal behavior. At best this makes the 6’8″ loser look like a big pussy.

 

COMEY ADMITS DEEP STATE SCUM INFEST GOVERNMENT LIKE TERMITES

However, Comey, in his book tour, gave us another civics lesson. He confirmed the existence of the Deep State.

Per the Daily Mail 4/19/2018, this:

“James Comey has admitted that there is a deep state but claimed that it was actually a ‘deep ballast’ against corruption.

The fired FBI director said there is a group of people in law enforcement, intelligence and the military who work for what they see as the interests of America.

Comey described the group as ‘unchangeable’ and said no single president could change them because they are so embedded in the bureaucracy.

He said the group was not a ‘deep state conspiring against the elected leadership of our government’ because they were trying to do the right thing. Comey made the admission on the first day of his nationwide book tour to promote his memoir, ‘A Higher Loyalty’, which sharply criticizes Donald Trump.

Speaking to the crowd, Comey said: ‘There is a deep state in this sense. There is a collection of people, CIA, NSA, FBI in the United State military services who care passionately about getting it right, who care passionately about the values we try to talk about.

‘No matter how they vote or how they talk at home, try desperately to do the right thing. That is deep, that is unchangeable actually.

‘No president at a single term could screw it up. It would take generations to change the culture of the United States military in its essence, federal law enforcement, of intelligence community. It would take generations, and that should comfort us.

‘There is a ballast, there is deep ballast in America. There is not a deep state conspiring against the elected leadership of our government.

‘In fact the adherence to values and the loyalty to the nation makes all of those people who are the ballast of this country desperately want the elected leadership of this country to succeed.’”

9/11. The face of Deep State failure or complicity

 

The “patriotic ballast” did nothing to stop Bush wars, or Clinton wars, or the Arkancide of people inconvenient to the Clintons. Comey’s “patriotic ballast” lied about the Flight 800 shoot down, they did nothing to stop the 9/11 attacks, and they played pocket pool while Hillary allowed the Putin regime to get their hands on 20% or so of our national uranium reserves. The “patriotic ballast” did nothing to win the war in Vietnam or get out. They did nothing to remedy the Iran hostage situation. They also obstructed President Reagan in his attempts to win the Cold War as bloodlessly as possible. They tried to remove President Reagan by turning the Contra aid mission into a money laundering, murder, drugrunning, and Moslem armsrunning ring that Bush 41 and then Governor Clinton were involved in up to their necks.

Jackie Kennedy, spattered in JFK’s blood, in DC after his murder.

Thanks, “Patriotic Ballast”

 

Comey’s “patriotic ballast” also was complicit in the murder of JFK. And in my opinion, they are complicit in the murders of the victims of the Las Vegas shooters. They have routinely ignored and may have facilitated Islamists who have in time committed many murders in this nation. The Boston Marathon, a San Bernardino, California government office, Fort Hood, and the Pulse Night Club in Florida are a partial list of such failures and/or facilitations.

These criminal assaults upon the civilians and military people of the Republic and the leaders the American people put into place are what Comey and other scumbag government payrollers, politicians, lawyers, tech robber barons and their socially inept employees, and Deep State operatives still in government like him – the New Copperheads – call “patriotism.”

You can’t cut an evil reptile into too many pieces. Especially these New Copperheads.

I hope to live long enough to see every one of them die in prison. People like these are a reason there is a Hell.

In the coming couple of posts, we are going to talk about court watching and precinct work … two things you as everyday Americans can do to help make America America again.

 

SHERLOCK JUSTICE

WE CAN SHOW YOU HOW TO BE YOUR OWN DETECTIVE.

Sherlock